I don't want to go into my view at the moment.

It's not a matter of which is the appropriate definition to be applied, ... but what it (i.e. the action) was.

It is really for the clubs and players and people providing their feedback to let us know,

As much as they might like to be camouflaged at times, we don't think they will be sufficiently camouflaged by the grass.

There were concerns that the weighting of prior offences when combined with carryover points may become excessive.

There was no thought to introducing this in the NAB Cup. This is a very preliminary, experimental trial only for a regional match at this point of time.

A player whose only offence in the past five years was a financial sanction will be eligible for a five-year good record.

The NAB Challenge provides the AFL an opportunity to test rules, it provides clubs the opportunity to test new players and set plays and strategies and we are using the occasion to test an idea to see if there is anything we can learn from having umpires officiating the match from different angles.

No reports were lodged and the Bulldogs haven't lodged any complaint and we confirmed with the Bulldogs they don't intend to.

These comments have provoked significant feedback from community football leagues and umpiring associations across Australia, all reporting dismay within their umpiring ranks about being able to retain numbers.